Side-by-side compare
Compare the cameras that matter.
Up to four products, every spec aligned, the winner of each round highlighted — so the right pick is obvious.
ComparZone verdict
The EOS R6 Mark II takes the overall win.
Highest composite score at 9.1/10 — edging out the X-T5 by 0.4 points. Best suited for overall. Scroll for the full breakdown.
Category wins · 16 attributes
EOS R6 Mark II6
X-T52
EOS R6 Mark IIBest for overall
X-T5Best for value
Performance profile
All 2 products overlaid · hover a name to isolate
Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm
X-T5
Category-by-category
Brightest bar leads each attribute
Price comparison
Starting price · lowest highlighted
Full specifications
Winning value highlighted per row
Autofocus3 specs
AF Points
1053
425
Subject Detection
Human, Animal, Vehicle
Human, Animal, Vehicle
Burst Rate(fps)
40 fps
15 fps
Build4 specs
Card Slots
Dual UHS-II SD
Dual UHS-II SD
Weather Sealing
Yes
Yes
Battery (CIPA)(shots)
760 shots
580 shots
Weight(g)
670 g
557 g
Image Quality5 specs
Sensor
24.2MP full-frame CMOS
40.2MP APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
Resolution(MP)
24.2 MP
40.2 MP
ISO Range
100–102,400
125–12,800
Dynamic Range(stops)
14.5 stops
14 stops
Stabilization
8-stop IBIS
7-stop IBIS
Performance1 specs
Autofocus Points
1053
425
Video3 specs
Video
4K 60p oversampled
6.2K 30p
Max Video
4K 60p uncropped
6.2K 30p
Internal Color
10-bit 4:2:2
10-bit 4:2:2
Why pick each
Standout strengths at a glance
#1
Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
9.1
“A speed demon for action and wildlife: 40fps electronic burst, superb subject tracking, and excellent ergonomi”
Autofocus 9.5
Handling 9.3
Wins AF Points
Wins Burst Rate
Best for overall · wins 6 specs
#2
Fujifilm
X-T5
8.7
“High-resolution APS-C with 40MP detail, classic tactile dials, compact lenses, and gorgeous film simulations.”
Build 9.0
Handling 9.0
Wins Resolution
Wins Weight
Best for value · wins 2 specs